TROWEL & SWORD

Home Current News Back Issues What's New Youth Resources Sermon Recordings Search

 

   

About us
Contact us
Subscriptions
Donations
Advertising
Links

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On the Interpretation and Use of the Bible
With Reflections on experience
Ronald S.Wallace, Wm.B.Eerdmans, 1999 137p

 

Review by Ray Hoekzema


The publisher suggests that this book is “warm, pastorally oriented instruction on how to read the Bible” and that it “succeeds on two levels – the scholarly and the pastoral.” Maybe! But as I began reading the book, warming to its contents, I also became aware that the scholarly part was questionable. In fairness to the author, he was unpretentious in his foreword.

Although I am not an ordained preacher, I have always been interested in the subject under review and read much about the need for discernment and the use of techniques in interpreting Scripture.

Wallace, now past his 80th year, was a pastor and for some time taught at Columbia Theological Seminary. His childhood did not include church worship, but he attended a Christian school. He tells that it, together with the fact that he grew up in a Judeo-Christian period, referring to it as “ethical”, led more easily into a Christian faith. He recalls that somehow the Biblical stories held together in his mind as having divine sanction, and therefore a ring of urgency and closeness to real truth. Elsewhere, he says that we can still use our reason and skill in the search for its meaning, and that we are encouraged to hope for a presence of Christ Himself to preside over the interpretation of the Scriptures.

Wallace says the message cannot be uncovered by mere analysis or didactic means. To convey the words of God with full force, we have to take seriously Christ’s promise to be in our midst, not only to interpret but also to preach what we preach – to re-sound and re-echo the invitations and commands in words adapted to the modern hearers.

Much of the author’s emphasis in conveying the message is on story telling. There is a lot to be said for that but to my mind, Wallace got carried away by this story-telling. In fairness to him, he does stress that it is important to have the doctrine alongside the story, though over-emphasis can bring sterility. In that light he refers to the current Alpha course as a demonstration of how powerful the influence of the simplest systematic presentation of ‘sound doctrine’ within house groups can become. He endorses the liberating and rallying role the doctrinal confessions have played in the Church in order to maintain the integrity of its witness to Christ and to free itself from false leadership.

Apart from a few other referees, Wallace is much taken in by Augustine, Luther but especially Calvin. Considering that, one wonders how things came unstuck. In a short account of his own experience, and I guess this is where the subtitle comes in, he intimates that early in his ministry he found himself in profound disagreement with the then up-to-date standard critical commentaries and the great majority of the scholars whom he consulted did not share his aims.

Wallace says that it will be obvious that the use of the word ‘reliability’ to define the standard that we are to expect to find in the Bible, leaves room within the Church for wide differences of opinion about what the Bible affirms and teaches. And that the Bible stories will come home to us all at different times under different circumstances in different ways.

Noting all of that, it is not so surprising that Wallace has a problem with the teaching on reprobation and with miracles. He says that by concentrating simply on the truth they teach about God and the life of faith, he finds himself inclined to evade the issue of factuality. He has problems with parts of the Elijah and Elisha accounts, with Jonah and Job, which he prefers to regard as stories rather than historic fact. The first chapters of Genesis have impressed him as intending to be regarded mainly as story.

So, even though there is much in the first part of the book that is useful for office-bearers and lay members, who like the Bereans are encouraged to ‘examine the Scriptures for themselves’ in order to ’see whether these things are so’ (Acts 1711), special discernment is needed by those deciding to read this book. What started out as encouraging for me, became saddening – deeply disappointing, to say the least.
 

Books
Music
Movies

Return to top of page

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All reports of problems and comments concerning this site: webmaster@trowelandsword.org.au

All material on this site © 2004 Trowel & Sword

Privacy