|
|
The Human Genome
Rev.Albert Esselbrugge
You may have picked up in the media how scientists who are involved in
the “human genome” project have discovered that the human being is much
simpler than originally thought, but as a consequence is even more
complex than ever? I know! That sounds like a contradiction. Let me
explain.
There are two, possibly more, teams of scientists actively trying to map
the genetic structure of the human. This “decoding” effort is called the
human genome project. One of these teams announced recently with some
media fanfare that the number of genes that go to make a human was once
thought to be in the vicinity of 80,000. Some estimations have been much
higher, but it has now been discovered that we only have a mere 30,000
genes, not all that many more genes than a mouse has.
What this means is that the blue prints of the human is much less
complex than at first thought. What is now boggling the minds of those
who have an interest in this study, is what exactly makes a human so
vastly different from other living creatures if the most basic
components of life are not all that different, and what is it that makes
each human unique from all others? Are there other factors after all
that have a greater bearing on the development and growth of a human?
Factors such as the environment, not only of air and trees and
pollution, but relationships and the day-to-day interactions and events
experienced. How much do these things shape the entire person?
Perhaps unravelling the genetic make up of mankind will not answer the
question of what the essence of life is and human life in particular
after all. It is no exaggeration to say that Christians have always
known the human creature is both immensely simple and profoundly
complex.
The Bible teaches us from Genesis on, but especially in the first three
chapters of Genesis, that we have been created by the special and
particular interest and art of the Almighty. He, who is Lord over all,
formed and created us, and gave us what He gave no other living
creature. He breathed into us the breath of life, and we are told, it is
at that moment, man became a living being (Genesis 2:7).
As complex as we are in our material being, these bodies can still be
dissected, categorised, examined further and researched to the
infinitesimal parts that make up our material selves. Each part can be
named, measured, computed, and valued until in the end we may just end
up with a vast encyclopaedia description of the structure of the human
body. At the end of that process of research and examination we will
still only have a chemical, electrical and mechanical description of
something that will defy a full explanation. No one will ever be able to
dissect and quantify the soul – the breath of God in these bodies. It is
this I believe which truly makes us so complex.
That then raises the question of whether genetic research of this nature
is permissible before God. I believe it is not only permissible, but
even a requirement from God who commanded us to “subdue” creation
(Genesis 1:28). Scientific research of any kind for the Christian
however must always begin with God, and be about extending and deepening
our wonder at the greatness of the Lord God who brought this fascinating
creation into existence. For the Christian then, what we see in nature
and discover through human experience and scientific experimentation is
about glorifying God alone.
The worrying aspect about current genetic research is that there is
strong evidence that this research is dominated and controlled by
evolutionary humanists. Dr Francis Collins, director of the National
Genome Research Institute, the US partner in the publicly funded Human
Genome Project, speaking recently at the World Life Sciences Forum
conference in Lyon, France was quoted by the Australian newspaper, The
Daily Telegraph (http://news.com.au) as saying “mankind would inevitably
start tinkering with it’s genetic make-up to take control of evolution”.
It is believed by the majority of geneticists that “humanity is not here
by design and special creation but only by evolutionary processes. Since
there is no Creator, Sustainer, and Controller of the universe, we must
look out for ourselves and work out our own destiny.” (p.54 “Human
Cloning” by LP Lester & JC Hefley).
Stephen Hawking, while not a geneticist but a theoretical physicist is
also a prominent proponent of taking charge of the evolutionary process,
Dr Collins quotes him as “not be(ing) satisfied with our current
biological status” and that we “should try to improve ourselves.”
Collins went on to say “I must say I find this an interesting but
somewhat chilling discussion because it implies that somebody would know
what an improvement was, and it also implies that we will be sure enough
about the safety issues to contemplate our very biology.”
Nothing has changed in the heart of mankind since the fall. The desire
to supplant God and be our own god remains as strong as ever (Genesis
3:5,6)
Back to top
Back to April 2001 index
Back to 2001 Index
Return to Features Year Selector
|